Archives for: December 2009
TheDefendersOnline.com - Jabari Asim's Debut Fiction: A Taste of Honey
This conversation originally appeared on TheDefendersOnline.com:
*****
By Eisa Nefertari Ulen
It is entirely fitting that Jabari Asim’s debut fiction, A Taste of Honey, is published in this, the year after Change. Everything is different now that the President of the United States is a black man. Everything changes in Asim’s collection of connected short stories, too—not because a leader is on the rise, but because one is shot down.
It is 1967, the year before Martin Luther King, Jr.’s assassination brought America very different kind of change. King’s assassination brought us burning and looting, but Asim remembers the innocence just before everything exploded, when black communities were thriving with locally-owned businesses and all the boys on the block had nicknames.
In Asim’s narratives, everyone in the neighborhood is close enough to be familiar. Boys grow into manhood under the watchful gaze of elder porch-sitters whose parents had joined the Great Migration. But all is not bucolic in Asim’s aptly-named Midwestern town of Gateway.
A Taste of Honey Jabari AsimThe same boys who watch Mr. Terrific and Captain Nice on TV also witness police brutality. Fists are pumped because, as one young son realizes to his amazement, on the white side of town, stores are “bigger, brighter, and cleaner… Oblivious to the hostile stares of shoppers and employees alike, he gaped wonderingly at the fresher produce.”
Violent whites attempt to circumscribe black achievement with mean looks, poor services, sexual assault, police batons, and hunting rifles. Even in the segregated all-black community where Asim’s characters live, white ghosts, real and figurative, haunt African-American strivers.
In one story, “Ashes to Ashes,” vigilante horrors help spur the migration to towns like Gateway. Asim leaves the reader with no argument against the racial politics of the people on the black side of town, where even the most conservative residents can “see the pale hand of the Man in everything…Ask old folks for evidence to support their claims and they’d say, ‘Just keep on living. You’ll see. ’”
Asim captures the mid-twentieth century, the mid-west, the space we occupy between our own love and the hate of the harsh world outside communities like North Gateway.
He is also honest about what we did wrong as we shifted from the year before King’s death to everything after. The Warriors, a local, Panther-esque organization, stumbles. They reject stability and tradition – and that means rejecting weddings, baptisms, and regular jobs that pay the bills. Meanwhile, marriage and family march strong into a kind of power that could never be expressed in a tight fist. Asim makes a case for church, for school, for lemon pie. Surely, these are the things we can count on not to change, but to endure.
With a 20/20 hindsight that that has seen the disintegration of The Movement in the 70s and the explosion of crack in the 80s, 90s bling and murder rates rising (again) in the 00s, Asim looks back at The Revolution. A devoted husband and father and author of ten books, he nostalgically evokes a different revolution. He remembers the revolutionary power of Black song stirring folk to catch the spirit—even when they stand in the street outside the church. He knows the revolutionary fervor of black mothers and fathers fiercely protective of their own. And Asim bears witness to, and celebrates the triumph of the most revolutionary act of all: Love.
Q: You wrote The N Word: Who Can Say It, Who Shouldn’t, And Why, so the exchange in Day Work between a self-styled but undisciplined revolutionary and the leader of the Warriors is especially significant because this is the only place in A Taste of Honey where the B-word and N-word are used, just as the more reckless character is poised to riot and cause chaos in the Gateway community. How important is that scene to you?
A: I have always been struck by Bayard Rustin’s criticism of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), which he said was sometimes hampered by a desire to offer psychological solutions to problems that were profoundly economic. Pee Wee, the character who uses the n-word, consistently confuses racially-charged rhetoric with actual political strategy. Talking tough eases some psychological need of his, but does nothing for the community he supposedly serves. He is unable to see beyond the visceral and emotional and thereby recognize the real work that organizations like his need to do, and his language reflects that lack of vision. I wanted Pee Wee to represent a decline in the kind of activism that had been flourishing in some urban communities, when service and sacrifice were supplanted by aimless, thoughtless rage that quickly turned inward.
Q: One theme in your collection of short stories seems to be that, while political activism is important, real revolution takes place in marriage. What do you think were the major failures of the urban activists of the 1960s and 1970s? What were their biggest triumphs?
A: I’ve always been bemused by brothers who talk a lot about nation-building and institution-building, but are unable to commit to the most fundamental unit of nation-building: their own families. They go on and on about “the nation” and “revolution” when the most revolutionary thing they can do is devote themselves to their wives and children—the very behavior, in fact, that our traditional oppressors have wanted us to avoid more than any other. I wanted to suggest that to engage in mindless promiscuity and absentee parenting is the same as implementing a white supremacist agenda. I also wanted to shine a light on the kinds of men I knew and admired as a child, men like my father, who lived lives of quiet integrity.
As for the activism of previous decades, I believe the triumphs far outweigh the failures. Having said that, I also believe that the black leadership model, once based on selflessness and service (and embodied by folks such as Joanne Robinson, Ella Baker and Fannie Lou Hamer, to name just a few) has been almost completely supplanted by bluster, false bravado, and a desire to be rich and famous. In many cases, it’s difficult to distinguish between black entertainers and black people who posture before the television cameras as “leaders,” “spokespersons,” and “pundits.” I also wish the activism of the 60s had placed greater emphasis on an activist-entrepreneur model instead of an activist-consumer model. Culturally speaking, that would call for less reactionary boycotting of racist storytelling and more pro-active, self-generated storytelling.
Q: Gateway is located in the mid-west, and it also acts as a temporal space through which the black community shifts from the past of Emancipation and Jim Crow to the post-Civil Rights Era and a return to black families like the Obamas. Did the 2008 presidential election and the presentation of solid black family life on an international stage influence your work?
A: I had actually finished the manuscript for A Taste of Honey before the Obamas seized the national spotlight. I’ve written all of my books from my perspective as a husband and father, and this one was no different. I respond well as a reader to portrayals of black men and women who bravely take on the challenge of love and monogamy, and that affinity tends to fuel my impulses as a writer.
Q: You are the author of two nonfiction books, five children’s books, an essayist, and a poet. How and when do you manage to generate so much work while maintaining your home life as a husband and father of five?
A: Please don’t forget Not Guilty, my first book for grown-ups. And I have two more children’s books coming out in April. When my wife and I had just two children (many years ago), I was laid off from my job as a reporter at a black weekly newspaper. I couldn’t find another job as a writer for two long years. I vowed that if I ever got another opportunity to write for a living, I would work until I dropped. I used to pray for the chance to be busy, and once I got busy I never complained about it. I tend to write in streaks, as opposed to writing every day.
I wrote much of A Taste of Honey while working on The N Word. I took six months’ unpaid leave from The Washington Post, wrote nonfiction in the mornings and fiction in the evenings. Typically I might write all day Monday and Tuesday, and not return to my computer until Friday. None of it would be possible without my understanding kids and my brilliant wife, Liana, to whom all my books are dedicated.
Q: You’re also former deputy editor of The Washington Post Book World, former vice president of the National Book Critics Circle, and Editor-in-Chief of The Crisis. What major trends do you see in books publishing and for black authors in particular?
A: It’s never been easy for black writers of literary ambition, whether they work in fiction or nonfiction, and the present picture is no rosier. With some exceptions, the book industry in general has undergone a real shakeout, resulting in fewer deals and smaller advances. I think this will affect black writers disproportionately, in part because publishers have rarely seen us as capable of attracting non-black readers. I’m not the only black author who will tell you that some of my best audiences have been composed of readers with all kinds of ethnic backgrounds, but somehow publishers continue to fail to notice the diverse markets to which we can stake a claim. Whereas recent years have been relatively prosperous for creators of so-called street lit, we’ll see a lot fewer titles in that category as well. There has always been an appalling shortage of black people in decision-making positions inside publishing houses, and now we have the fewest in recent memory. Some of them do absolutely terrific work championing black writers (I did the same thing when I worked at The Washington Post), but they can only do so much. At the same time, smaller houses such as Akashic and Agate have become reliable sources of high-quality black writing. I believe we’ll see the emergence of similar enterprises, with some of them operating as writers’ collectives.
Eisa Nefertari Ulen is author of the novel Crystelle Mourning and a co-founder of RingShout: A Place for Black Literature. She lives with her husband and son in Brooklyn. www.EisaUlen.com
2 comments
yes! we descendants of quakers have to stick together. ;)
joy!
eisa
Guest Blog - Suad Abdul-Khabeer on Avatar: The Limits of the Human Imagination
Avatar: the limits of the human imagination
14.25 per person. That’s how much I paid for my husband, my sister and myself to see Avatar. I wasn’t following the hype leading up to the movie so I wasn’t too familiar with the plot, but I did catch a press piece touting the movie’s cinematic innovation. That, paired with Zoe Saldana, a fellow afrolatina, heightened my expectations and for naught. Half way through the film I was bored and wondering if I could get my money back or at least hold on to my 3D glasses for another film. I like science fiction movies but I am not a fan girl, so on one level the special effects fell on an untrained eye but what really kept me from enjoying the movie was a critical mind.
The natives “the Na’vi” are blue and about 12 feet tall; they also sport cornrows or braided extensions along with Masai/Native American/Melanesian (name your anthropological field site) jewelry and headdresses. And lest we veer too far off script the natives…I mean the Na’vi are extremely fit and barely clothed.
Haven’t I seen this somewhere before?
Then there is the Na’vi and their “all mother/spirit earth/tree god” who they go and sing to when the battleships are coming.
We haven’t gotten tired of this yet?
These “noble savages” exhibit that familiar “ au naturel” spirituality where they understand the land and the animals….which makes sense considering their animalesque features…the Na’vi can bond with animals as one….another uniquely “native”, I mean Na’vi, skill.
Wow that’s original!
Yet despite all of this knowledge, they still need the golden (white) boy, albeit in an avatar of a Na’vi body, to save the day. To be the only one who can be innovative, break tradition and taboo, to lead them and inspire them and in the end to ultimately “go native” (I am hanging my anthropologist head in shame) and leave behind the “soulless”—and I use “soul” deliberately—war mongering “civilized” world whose alienation from their own “all mother” led them to slaughter her too.
What may have been a little different was the fact that the movie’s commentary on American imperialism includes (some) Americans—yes Americans—killing other Americans in a time when the nation is at war. Of course these Americans are unredeemable because they are soulless and war mongering, making their deaths are more palatable. Nevertheless it is a weak commentary. It is weak because it is a commentary that is still invested in white supremacy and white patriarchy. It is the white man who ultimately saves the Na’vi, without him they would have never survived. Even the lone white woman with some semblance of authority, played by Sigourney weaver, is in the end an impotent character, a “tree hugger” with no real power against the white men who have all the power—to do evil and to do good. Furthermore, with the critique of US power so heavily cloaked in the comfort of “native symbolism”--will the average American viewer actually see the criticism, be able to disentangle from their own attachment (whatever race/ethnicity) to the fantasy of the master race?
When I first started to write this piece, all I could think of was the phrase “the limits of the human imagination.” What does this mean? Well, for one, it has something to do with God. Although the film seems to be ambivalent about how the viewer should feel about the Ewya (the Na’vi’s god)--haughty or in awe--, the secular humanist impulse that would celebrate the film as an achievement of human capacity might need to reconsider that position. It is clear the director spent countless creative hours and a ton of money to create a fantastical picture…that merely rehashes old stories. Therefore, from my vantage point, rather than see this a triumph of the human, who knows no limit, the use of a well-worn storyline speaks to the exact opposite: humans cannot know nor create beyond themselves––this is the natural limit of humanity.
Yet within the realm of what humans actually are capable of, this film still made me consider the limits of the human imagination, but in a different way––even if we are always destined to create tales that reflect our own understanding, don’t we have the potential to reflect our own understandings in new ways? Could Avatar have been told without a noble savage? Can “natives” be complex?
How’s this for an alternative ending: The Na’vi do not send the remaining humans back to earth, without harming them, ultimately leaving open the possibility of their return with bigger and better ships (and of course the profits from Avatar: the Return and Avatar: the Next Generation ). Rather, the Na’vi give the remaining earthlings the choice between becoming permanent Na’vi or death. I know we like happy endings and in all seriousness, violence is not the answer, and way too often what we see on the wide screen….but if we want to push the limits of our reflections on ourselves what if the Na’vi weren’t such peace-loving-turn-the-other-cheek-folk, but more strategic….more flawed…more human?
4 comments
TheDefendersOnline.com - Attica Locke's Black Water Rising
This review originally ran on TheDefendersOnline.com.
*****
By Eisa Nefertari Ulen
Attica Locke has added her name to the list of best black genre fiction with her debut thriller, Black Water Rising, acclaimed by many, from The New York Times to The Seattle Times, and named Booklist Best Debut Crime Novel of 2009.
A screenwriter and former Sundance Institute fellow, whose credits include Disney, Paramount and Twentieth Century Fox, Locke is the daughter of civil rights activists and is currently at work on an HBO miniseries about the movement. Those who are the offspring of civil rights and black power activists are, like Locke, often haunted by the ghosts of that era.
Some, like Fred Hampton, Jr., lost parents to the violence of the struggle itself, just as Locke’s main character, Jay Porter, loses his fictional father to southern racists. Others, like me, are haunted by the psychological and emotional harm complete participation in 1960s radical change had on our parents who did manage to survive.
Black Water RisingJay Porter must grapple with that interior damage, too. In this weighty page-turner, Jay, a struggling defense attorney, rides a rickety boat along a Houston, Texas bayou with his pregnant wife and the boat’s owner, a cousin of a brother from around the way. As they ride through the city’s gritty Fifth Ward, the three passengers hear gunshots, a splash, and the sure sound of trouble. Urged by his wife to rescue the woman in the water, Jay jumps into the muddy bayou—and into a muddy mess involving Houston’s political and business elite.
The obvious questions—who did it and why—drive the plot. Jay can’t let go of his encounter on the water, and a union strike, real estate schemes, an oil maven, a couple of prostitutes, the local paper, a black Ford, and a midnight beat-down keep the story moving. While Locke is astute at handling each plot point, Jay’s decisions, his responses to each revelation that inches him closer to solving the mystery on the bayou, give Black Water Rising its real heft.
Flashbacks, from Jay’s father’s death to his own youthful participation in the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and pan-Africanism, explain the motivations of a man trapped in a mental prison constructed during his college years. Locke deftly identifies COINTELPRO as the warden Jay Porter must confront before he can liberate his own soul and survive to witness what his own father could not: the birth of his first child.
Despite the effects of government surveillance on Jay’s mental state, Locke does not let her protagonist completely off the hook. Jay Porter has been, in many ways, complicit in his own anguished oppression. He may have to face the demon of counter-intelligence, but Jay must also recognize that he has become his own jailer, the one too willing to pull the cell door closed whenever his wife, father-in-law, or a former comrade tries to help set him free.
Because it often presents the forces of good in conflict with the very bad, genre fiction lends itself to this type of exploration. While the struggle with social forces personified by greedy oil men and corrupt union officials makes Locke’s work a thriller, it is the nuanced and complex inner life of Jay Porter that elevates Black Water Rising to the level of achievement reached by detective writer Walter Mosley, speculative fiction writer Octavia Butler, and horror/supernatural writer Tananarive Due.
Like these and other African-American novelists, Locke explores themes of race and power. She has earned a place with her literary fore-parents because she is deftly astute at handling not only the good and the bad, but also the muddy middle we all ride in between.
Eisa Nefertari Ulen is the author of Crystelle Mourning and a founding member of RingShout: A Place for Black Literature. She lives with her husband and son in Brooklyn. www.EisaUlen.com
:: Next >>





