Archives for: November 2009
Queer Studies 101 – The LGBT Struggle is a Civil Rights Struggle
In a grainy, black and white video, a cluster of men shifts from one end of the screen to another. They could be laughing, roughhousing, man-hugging. They could be man-loving. In seconds, the blur of bodies separates, and three distinct individuals appear. That they are neither laughing, nor hugging, nor roughhousing is clear, becomes clearer as one of them flees. But then, he is caught. He is trapped. Blow after blow lands against his head, his face, his body. He struggles up and is beaten down. Beaten down again and again and again. A car passes along the cross-street at the top of the video. More blows. Another car passes. The blows don’t stop. The video records time. One minute. Two minutes. Finally, the two attackers turn to leave. A car flashes past them. The two attackers do not run. When the car is gone they return to their victim, to the man now prone on the otherwise empty street. They beat him again. They touch his body. They feel him below the belt.
Finally, they leave him. The man struggles on the street. He can not rise, and he could be hit, run over by a car, if he passes out there. He could die. He does not pass out, though, not yet. He struggles, fumbles, meanders, falls, makes it to the sidewalk, falls again. Eventually, he wanders off screen.
The victim has a name: Jack Price. He has a home not far from this Queens, New York street, the street where he is nearly killed. He has a story. The two who beat him called him f-----, “stupid f----“ and “dumb f----.“ They have names, too. Daniel Rodriguez and Daniel Aleman, just 21 and 26. They targeted him. Jack Price fell into a medically-induced coma because his neighbors beat him. Because he is gay.
The level of homophobia in American society is horrifying. The LGBT struggle is a Civil Rights struggle; yet, in the Black community, fear of homosexuality (in Others and in ourselves) prevents us from advancing this cause as our own. Meanwhile, the nation has taken one step forward. On October 22nd, the US Senate expanded the Federal Hate Crimes Bill to include gender and disability – as well as sexual orientation and gender identity.
Aptly named The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, this legislation links the struggles for LGBT and African American liberation. Freedom from physical assault because of race or sexual orientation helps form one cause for Civil Rights across the socially-constructed lines of race and sexual orientation that would divide and conquer marginalized peoples. http://www.nbjc.org/news/nbjc-welcomes-passage-of.html
Fear of LGBT Rights is dangerous because there is little difference between that and fear of African American advancement. The fear of both comes from the same place: Hate. And the Hate comes from the same place, too: Ignorance.
But, some say, Gays have not endured our pain. No other people were forcibly stolen from their homelands, carried across the physical and emotional space of the Middle Passage, and subjected to centuries – generations after generations after generations – of the brutality experienced by Africans in the Americas. How could anyone compare?
Indeed.
It makes no sense to compare pain. To compare any group experience to the African experience in The West is dangerous. No other people – none – have suffered over the centuries as Black people have.
Yet Native Americans do have a unique experience of suffering: Genocide. Jews have a unique experience of suffering: Anti-Semitism. And some of our gay brothers have so many: Racism and Classism and Homophobia and, for our lesbian sisters, (http://www.uloah.com/) add Sexism, too. The LGBT folk in the Black community are among the most suffering Americans, with –isms on top of –phobia weighing them down.
All oppressed groups deserve the right to full participation in the public sphere. This right to civil justice crosses group boundaries and forms important links that connect us all to the righteous cause of rebellion and resistance.
Yes, to compare and rank one group’s pain over another’s is folly; but, to explore certain aspects of their experiences along with certain aspects of the Black experience makes perfect sense. Because, in the end, we are more alike as we slosh about in the great pool of humanity than we are different. To explore the manifestations of homophobia in America is to journey the Civil Rights Trail.
The complex and deeply nuanced urge to serve in the nation’s armed services is one similar experience the African American and the LGBT communities share. How to articulate the impulse to protect the very country that denies full Black citizenship and inclusion in our participatory democracy? That is a question those silenced under Don’t Ask Don’t Tell still have.
We share so much more that can be quantified. Isn’t preoccupation with LGBT physicality – their walk, their gestures, their homosexual bodies just like the preoccupation with Black physicality – our walk, our gestures, our African bodies?
What of the exaggerated features and pickaninny stereotypes that still haunt Black America? What of the exaggerated features and fagotty stereotypes that still haunt LGBT America?
And some ghosts are real. Ask Dwan Prince, a Brooklyn brother who is still partially paralyzed following the 2005 beating he received for flirting with another man. Haunted by his attacker and, perhaps, haunted by the ghost of young Emmett Till, the child beaten to death for allegedly flirting with a white woman in 1955. (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/till/)
Now, during this LGBT Movement, we need to do what so many whites did during Abolition and Civil Rights: We need to selflessly advocate on behalf of others, give them and the world a kind of advocacy that we will never benefit from.
Except, of course, that we will.
2 comments
Thanks for this--beautiful words, as always. I was especially struck by your thought about the connection between LGBT physicality and Black physicality--how the focus on individual parts or sexualized fragments can dehumanize and promote scorn.
I visit your blog every so often and just wanted to thank you for your thoughts on a lot of these complex issues going on right now.
eisa
Statement from Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn on Atlantic Yards Ruling
Atlantic Yards Fight Far From Over
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is our press release in response to the Court of Appeals ruling today on the eminent domain case (and more new round up here):
For Immediate Release: November 24, 2009
Constrained Court Rules Against Property Owners and Tenants in Atlantic Yards Eminent Domain Case
Despite Ruling, Fight Against Ratner's Brooklyn Project Is Far From Over
BROOKLYN, NY — New York's high court ruled today against property owners and tenants who had challenged the state's use of eminent domain to seize their homes and businesses for the enrichment of developer Bruce Ratner and his Atlantic Yards project in Prospect Heights, Brooklyn.
In the 6-1 decision (with dissent from Judge Robert Smith) the Court of Appeals ruled that the state agency's determination to take the plaintiffs property had a rational basis under state law.
"The fight against the Atlantic Yards project is far from over. The community has four outstanding lawsuits against the project and, meanwhile, the arena bond financing clock ticks louder and louder for Ratner. While this is a terrible day for taxpaying homeowners and tenants in New York, this is not the end of our fight to keep the government from stealing our homes and businesses,” said Develop Don't Destroy spokesman and lead plaintiff Daniel Goldstein. "Governor Paterson and Mayor Bloomberg now need to decide if they want their legacy to be the next New London—a dust bowl in the heart of Brooklyn caused by the abuse of eminent domain, because that will be the outcome if they allow the property seizures and final clearance for Ratner's unfeasible project."
"We are disappointed, but undeterred. We lost this round, but the legal fight is not over. My clients will continue to resist Ratner's efforts to steal their homes and businesses in the New York courts," said lead attorney Matthew Brinckerhoff of Emery, Celli, Brinckerhoff & Abady. "Because the Court of Appeals made it clear that it considered itself 'bound' by the self-serving record created by the Empire State Development Corporation prior to its December 2006 public use finding, and thus refused to consider the events leading up to the ESDC's adoption of a modified general project plan two months ago, we now intend to commence a new lawsuit seeking to compel the ESDC to issue new or amended public use findings. It would be perverse and unfair if my clients homes and businesses were confiscated based on circumstances that no longer exist. At the same time, we will also vigorously defend the cases that the State will now file seeking to seize my clients' properties, which is the second barrier that Ratner and the ESDC must now attempt to overcome."
"While we are deeply disappointed in the Court's decision, our fight against the government's abuses on Ratner's behalf continues, and we expect to defeat Atlantic Yards through political and legal means", said Develop Don't Destroy legal director Candace Carponter. "It now falls to Governor Paterson to guarantee, through a binding legal contract, which the State would be required to enforce, that all the developer's promises about the project—including all of the ‘affordable' housing and the ten year construction timeline—are fulfilled. If the Governor is unable to do that, he is duty-bound to abandon this ill-fated project, and start over so the rail yards can be developed properly and realistically."
In 2005, in the wake of the Supreme Court's widely despised Kelo decision that expanded the reach of eminent domain, then-Senator David Paterson called for a state-wide blanket moratorium on the use of eminent domain.
"Governor Paterson needs to ask himself what happened to Senator Paterson's position on eminent domain. And then he needs to act on his principles," Carponter concluded.
----------------------------------------
Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries Statement on Eminent Domain Ruling
"I am extremely disappointed with the decision of the Court. The power of eminent domain is extraordinary and should only be authorized in limited circumstances where, unlike in this case, there is a clear and robust public benefit. The use of eminent domain to benefit a private developer to build a basketball arena for a team owned by a foreign billionaire is an abuse of this extraordinary power, and I hope that Governor Paterson will choose not to exercise it."
TheDefendersOnline.com - Interview with Elizabeth Nunez
By Eisa Nefertari Ulen
Anna In-Between, the seventh book from acclaimed author Elizabeth Nunez, is one of the finest novels published this year. Nunez has made each word choice with the economy of a poet. The result is elegant prose: substantive, meaningful, but never wordy or clunky, just beautifully satisfying and thought-provoking.
Elizabeth Nunez copy
Elizabeth Nunez
Nunez, Provost and Senior Vice President at Medgar Evers College in New York City, has written several acclaimed books, including Bruised Hibiscus, which won the American Book Award in 2001, and her latest work, a New York Times Editor’s Choice, Anna In-Between.
In addition to authoring several novels and co-editing the anthologies, Defining Ourselves: Black Writers in the Nineties; and Stories from Blue Latitudes: Caribbean Woman Writers at Home and Abroad, Nunez is co-founder and former Director of The National Black Writers Conference, and former chair of the PEN American Center Open Book Committee.
In Anna In-Between, the title character, a 40-year-old divorced, childless woman who runs the fictional Equiano Books in New York, has returned to the nameless Caribbean island of her birth. While struggling to edit a manuscript, Anna also struggles with her mother, Beatrice Sinclair, who has breast cancer, and her own yearning for respect from her mother and her boss at the publishing company.
In this interview for TheDefendersOnline, Nunez discusses the state of black books, the “authentic self,” and the powerful narrative she has crafted—one that honors our finest literary traditions and most controversial topics.
Q: Anna In-Between is your seventh novel, the one Ishmael Reed has called your best. What was your inspiration for this narrative?
A: Anna In-Between grew out of an overwhelming feeling of loss that I experienced in the last few years. I had accomplished what I had set out to do—what most immigrants set out to do. I had achieved the means to live a financially independent life: I had the university degrees, a good job, and enough money to educate my son, purchase a house, car, and all the material things that would ensure I would have a comfortable life.
Yet something was missing. I wanted to be connected to my roots, but where were my roots? So I began this novel about a woman who had immigrated to the US when she was 19. Now, close to 40, she returns to her Caribbean island homeland and discovers that her assumptions about the people and place are all wrong; even the landscape seems to work against her. Then where does she belong?
All human beings have a need to belong, to a country, a community, a family, a significant other. This is a novel about our need to belong. I chose to explore the life of an upper-middle class West Indian woman because this is the type of woman I know best. I come from a similar background. Anna’s career in NY publishing gives me a chance to express my dismay about the direction the publishing of books by black writers seems to be going.
Q: In many ways your protagonist and her family and friends on the nameless island where the novel is set defy the many stereotypes Americans have of Caribbean life. How important were these issues to you during the writing process?
A: Well, I did not set out with a plan to set the record straight on the realities of West Indian life as much as to tell a story about a woman whose background I…could write about with a degree of authority and confidence. But it is true that most Americans are comfortable with pigeonholing West Indians as people in need of help, who are happy to serve them either here in the US as domestics and laborers, or on the islands as wait staff in hotels and sandy beaches. Many Americans seem to have a hard time imagining a Caribbean island society that is quite complex, ranging from working class to upper class, including a very strong and self-sufficient middle class with professionals, merchants, intellectuals and owners of big business.
Q: Your title character, Anna Sinclair, hovers in the spaces between the United States and the Caribbean, between confidence and vulnerability, between community and isolation. She also exists somewhere in the muddy middle of the color line. Why did you choose to examine the multiplicity of identities and complex racial narratives of most black people living in the West?
A: I resent the tendency of the West to define the identity of people based on categories that are comfortable for Westerners, categories based simply on skin color. The reality is more complex, especially on the Caribbean islands, where inter racial couplings have been common for a very long time. I think of my twin first cousins; the male is blue-eyed and blond, the female dark olive-skinned with black hair, both of the same parentage. In South Africa, under apartheid, my male cousin was identified as white, his sister as colored.
But even in sub-Sahara Africa, where he worked as a missionary, black Africans insisted on indentifying my male cousin as white. Yet who determines which of the twins is white and which is black?
In the novel, Anna quotes T.S. Eliot’s The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock:
“And when I am formulated, sprawling on a pin, / When I am pinned and wriggling on the wall, / Then how should I begin/ To spit out all the butt-ends of my days and ways?”
Q: The dislocated self, caught in the space in between, is a persistent theme in the work of writers of African descent, and generally references the Middle Passage as a space of transition, where the authentic self is often lost, and sometimes recovered. But your work makes few direct references to the Middle Passage. Has the voluntary migration from the Caribbean to the United States become more dominant in the soul of the West Indian immigrant? Is this the primary space where we often become lost, or trapped in-between?
A. Who is to determine “the authentic self”? We are part of the human race, the human family, and have a right to the human cultural heritage wherever that heritage is located. Mozart and Shakespeare belong to me, as well as Achebe and the rituals of African spiritualism.
Our journey on this earth is to achieve our human potential. We are born human beings, but it is quite another thing to be human, to become human. Dislocation from the African past is only one of the dislocations that Caribbean people experience; there are many others.
In this novel, I focus on dislocation from the very landscape of one’s homeland, dislocation from one’s family and friends, dislocation from the nuances of one’s cultural beginnings. But from my very first novel, I was determined to find a place for a reminder of the brutality of the Middle Passage in all my novels. In seven novels I have done just that, including this one where Anna, her father and her mother have a spirited discussion on the effects of slavery.
Q: Your novel also presents a discourse on achievement and failure. In part, you explore what John Sinclair calls “the psychology of immigration.” What point were you trying to make with that running debate within the Sinclair family?
A: I am a bit tired of the tensions and animosities that exist between African Americans and Caribbean immigrants, fanned by people who find it useful to keep resentments burning as if to justify stereotypes ascribed to African Americans.
Yes, as a group, Caribbean immigrants have been successful. I believe I saw a report that indicated that in Queens, New York, Caribbean immigrants surpass Asians and Jews in income and education.
But it isn’t skin color or country of origin that explains this phenomenon. The truth is that all immigrants, of any skin color or from any country, are a special group of highly motivated people, who left their homelands for one reason alone: to improve their circumstances in life. Of course, they will be more ambitious; of course they will be more willing to make major sacrifices for success. They already made the hugest sacrifice of all when they left home, country and family.
Q: The natural world appears in many forms in this novel. Did you intend to offer a lament on over-development and the gaudy excess that followed an oil boom on the island?
A: That is an astute observation. Many times readers find in a novel things the writer was not conscious of intending, but which are still there in the work, perhaps unconsciously put there by the writer. So I agree with your analysis, though I was thinking more about the theme you mentioned earlier regarding dislocation. Not only is Anna dislocated from the Caribbean landscape, the natural world of her homeland, but it seems that her father is also required to do the same. It seems that one of the requirements for achieving middle-class status is eschewing connections to one’s earthy roots.
Q: With the references to oil and steel drums, the nameless island seems to be your own homeland, Trinidad. Why did you choose not to name the place where the book is set?
A: The challenge for the novelist is to create a world that is plausible, and characters who are believable. I wanted to avoid the distraction that is possible for readers who sometimes are critical of a work that does not correspond to certain facts. But though the novelist uses fact in fiction, he or she is creating a work of art that is driven by the narrative and the characters. Certain facts ground a work of fiction and can be distracting if they are inaccurate, but the writer must be free to use these facts in the service of his imaginative world.
Q: I have concerns for my own ancestral island home, Bermuda, that you explore in Anna In-Between, including over-development, Americanization of local culture, and increasing violence due to the drug trade. Do you think that these issues are on the minds of many people of Caribbean descent?
A: Yes, I worry that the media—print and electronic, the internet and TV—have become the new imperialists, the new colonists, shaping a world that serves the needs and pleasures of the Big Countries. I worry when I see so many examples in the Caribbean of people giving up their cultural expressions to imitate those of the developed world.
Q: Beatrice’s refusal to go to New York for the life-saving surgery she needs is stunning. As her reason for remaining in the Caribbean becomes clear, she and Anna begin to debate over Beatrice’s treatment and African-American life. It is clear Beatrice will die if she does not go to New York, but in one brilliant scene Anna loses the argument, and helps make the case for Beatrice’s decision. You’ve opened the door for readers to think about many topics related to the American health care system and black wellness. What motivated this aspect of your narrative?
A: I can’t say that I wrote this scene because in the US we are currently in the throes of a huge debate on reforming the health care system. Sometimes fiction mysteriously seems to reflect topical concerns. I was mostly interested in exploring our values, whether material comforts are more important, more satisfying than the peace and happiness possible when we are in sync with the values of our cultural heritage. Of course, in this novel, what is at stake is life itself.
I also had a chance to explore the consequences of the negative news about African-American life beamed through the TV in homes across the world. But it is not only African Americans who get judged by these narrow representations of their lifestyles; white Americans also get painted as racists and oppressors.
Q: How do you find the time and space to write such well-crafted prose, especially as you juggle your art with your duties as provost and senior vice president at Medgar Evers College?
A: I worked hard in this novel to marry the “what,” the subject matter, with the “how,” the language and style. I wanted to drill down to the diamond, to find the minimum number of words, the minimum descriptions that would convey the scenes and characters that were in my imagination.
I am no longer provost, so now I have more time to write. But I have never allowed teaching or administration to prevent me from writing. I need to write for my sanity and for my own understanding of myself and my world. I find time to write. It is at the top of my list of things to do every day. Writing helps me make sense of our chaotic world. It brings order to my life, and comfort to me.
Q: There is much debate among writers, editors, booksellers, and others in the book publishing industry about the rise of urban literature. In your novel, Anna is an editor attempting to publish the work of a more literary author and must confront her superior, who is giddy over the sales of urban lit. What compelled you to dramatize this debate in your book? How do we reconcile the aesthetic tradition of our literary fore-parents with the industry’s need for profit?
A: Your readers will find the answers to the questions you ask here in Anna’s ruminations on the state of publishing, especially publishing of writers of color. Sure, I understand that publishing is a business that, like all businesses, depends on financial profit. But publishing is also in a position of affecting culture and values. Publishers claim that they do not determine culture and values; they simply reflect the dominant values of a society.
However, by determining which books will be published, which books will be marketed aggressively, publishers exercise a sort of censorship that can seriously affect the decisions we make. The truth is that every major movement in the world was affected by a book. One can begin with the Bible, the works of Darwin, Marx, Sartre, Freud, De Beauvoir, Baldwin, Wright, Hurston, CLR James, Morrison etc, etc.
I am deeply distressed by the paucity of serious literary fiction by black writers that is being published today. I know it is not because black writers are not writing this work; I know it is because the publishing industry has determined that it is not profitable to publish this sort of work. Once upon a time, publishers were satisfied with single-digit profits; now they want to be like every other business and make double or triple digit profits.
But publishing is not like every other business; publishing is in the business of exploring the human condition, helping us to understand ourselves and inspiring us to improve ourselves and our world. True, books, like other art forms, should entertain us. I have no objections to the books that readers seek simply for entertainment. But books should also, and can also, challenge us intellectually, aesthetically, emotionally, politically and in other, deeper ways. A good book continues to cause the reader to think long after the reader has put it aside.
Eisa Nefertari Ulen is author of the novel Crystelle Mourning and a co-founder of RingShout: A Place for Black Literature. She lives with her husband and son in Brooklyn. www.EisaUlen.com
:: Next >>





